- 腘动脉陷迫综合征的治疗
- 深静脉血栓形成的治疗现状
- 静脉曲张的治疗方法
- 多节段下肢动脉闭塞的治疗
- 不开刀治疗腹主动脉瘤,无切口治...
- 如何选择腹主动脉瘤治疗方式?最...
- 腹主动脉瘤的保守治疗
- 我女儿21岁因小腿外侧海绵状血...
- 64岁母亲,肝门部胆管占位,怎...
- 降血脂药物可延缓早老性痴呆的进...
- 研究表明精神压力可能破坏DNA...
- 吸烟可加速男性烟民大脑老化
- 结直肠癌肝转移癌,仍有治愈机会...
- 卫生部叫停干细胞移植
- ACS:2012癌症统计发布(...
- 肾动脉狭窄
- 肾动脉狭窄求助
- 肾动脉狭窄求助
- 怎样治疗大腿和小腿的静脉曲张
- 2011 卫生部 胰腺癌诊疗规...
- 患者转移性肝癌,患高血压、糖尿...
- 卵巢癌3期,检查到网膜,直肠有...
- 肝硬化,脾大,怎么治?
- 我得了肝血管瘤,大小为2.8*...
- 肝血管瘤,右上腹隐痛。
- 食道癌的治疗
- 24岁男,乙肝携带者,肝区肿块...
- 放射性栓塞微球治疗化疗无效的乳...
- 肝转移癌的新希望,放射性微球栓...
- 胰腺癌的介入治疗
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 2011卫生部 原发性肝癌...
- 就诊指南
- 肝转移癌新的有效疗法:放射性钇...
- 雷诺综合征
- 雷诺综合征
- 颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)手术...
- 动脉硬化闭塞症的生活指导
- ?动脉陷迫综合征4
- ?动脉陷迫综合征3
- ?动脉陷迫综合征2
- ?动脉陷迫综合征1
- 下肢缺血的不可忽视的原因之一-...
- 代谢综合征
- 糖尿病慢性并发症
- 糖尿病急性并发症
- 老年糖尿病[
- 儿童和青少年糖尿病
- 糖尿病的特殊情况
- 糖尿病的治疗
- 糖尿病的治疗
- 糖尿病的治疗
- 糖尿病的诊断与分型
- 2型糖尿病的流行病学
- 中国2型糖尿病防治指南
- 腔内射频消融闭合术联合电凝术治...
- 腔内射频消融闭合术联合电凝术治...
- 腔内射频消融闭合术联合电凝术治...
- 通知--静脉曲张英文综述-最新...
- 世界上糖尿病发病情况
- 加拿大研究发现罹患糖尿病可令大...
- 下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的微创治疗进...
- 髂动脉闭塞性病变腔内开通的技术...
- 内膜下血管成形术的临床应用现状...
- 好消息:征集下肢深静脉血栓患者...
- 静脉曲张英文综述-最新Systematic Review of Treatments for Varicose Veins 01
- 作者:周玉斌|发布时间:2009-02-18|浏览量:1564次
Deanne Leopardi, BSc,1 Ben L. Hoggan, Bsc BPsych (Hons),1 Robert A. Fitridge, MS FRACS,2
Peter W.H. Woodruff, FRACS,3 and Guy J. Maddern, FRACS PhD,1,2,4
This systematic review compares the safety and efficacy of varicose vein treatments, including
conservative therapy, sclerotherapy, phlebectomy, endovenous laser therapy, radiofrequency辽宁省人民医院血管外科周玉斌
ablation, and surgery involving saphenous ligation and stripping. Systematic searches of medical
bibliographic databases were conducted in February 2008 to identify suitable studies published
from January 1988 onward. Articles were considered eligible for inclusion through the application
of a predetermined protocol. Safety and effectiveness data from the comparison of two or more
varicose vein procedures were extracted and analyzed. Seventeen studies, published between
2003 and 2007, were included in this review. Serious adverse events were rare. Minor adverse
events were more common but generally self-limiting. All treatments displayed levels of effectiveness
depending on the extent of the vein in question. Short-term advantages appeared to be associated
with sclerotherapy and endovenous treatments, and long-term effectiveness was more
apparent following surgical intervention. Evidence suggests conservative therapy is less effective
than sclerotherapy and surgery for the treatment of varicose veins. Ligation with stripping
plus phlebectomy is generally regarded as the ‘‘gold standard’’ for treating primary long saphenous
veins. Sclerotherapy and surgery both appear to have a place in the management of varicose
veins. Sclerotherapy and phlebectomy may also be more appropriate in patients with minor
superficial varicose veins not related to reflux of the saphenous system or as a post- or adjunctive
treatment to other procedures, such as surgery. Current evidence suggests endovenous laser
therapy and radiofrequency ablation are as safe and effective as surgery, particularly in the
treatment of saphenous veins. Most importantly, the type of varicose vein should govern the
intervention of choice, with no single treatment universally employed
Peter W.H. Woodruff, FRACS,3 and Guy J. Maddern, FRACS PhD,1,2,4
This systematic review compares the safety and efficacy of varicose vein treatments, including
conservative therapy, sclerotherapy, phlebectomy, endovenous laser therapy, radiofrequency辽宁省人民医院血管外科周玉斌
ablation, and surgery involving saphenous ligation and stripping. Systematic searches of medical
bibliographic databases were conducted in February 2008 to identify suitable studies published
from January 1988 onward. Articles were considered eligible for inclusion through the application
of a predetermined protocol. Safety and effectiveness data from the comparison of two or more
varicose vein procedures were extracted and analyzed. Seventeen studies, published between
2003 and 2007, were included in this review. Serious adverse events were rare. Minor adverse
events were more common but generally self-limiting. All treatments displayed levels of effectiveness
depending on the extent of the vein in question. Short-term advantages appeared to be associated
with sclerotherapy and endovenous treatments, and long-term effectiveness was more
apparent following surgical intervention. Evidence suggests conservative therapy is less effective
than sclerotherapy and surgery for the treatment of varicose veins. Ligation with stripping
plus phlebectomy is generally regarded as the ‘‘gold standard’’ for treating primary long saphenous
veins. Sclerotherapy and surgery both appear to have a place in the management of varicose
veins. Sclerotherapy and phlebectomy may also be more appropriate in patients with minor
superficial varicose veins not related to reflux of the saphenous system or as a post- or adjunctive
treatment to other procedures, such as surgery. Current evidence suggests endovenous laser
therapy and radiofrequency ablation are as safe and effective as surgery, particularly in the
treatment of saphenous veins. Most importantly, the type of varicose vein should govern the
intervention of choice, with no single treatment universally employed
TA的其他文章: